The PKR and especially Annuar Ibrahim is fast becoming irrelevant as Malaysian are becoming more intelligent!
Read this Article by Zaid Ibrahim
Zaid slams PKR over Zul’s case
KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 27 — Pakatan Rakyat ideologue Datuk Zaid Ibrahim today slammed PKR for treating Kulim Bandar Baharu MP Zulkifli Noordin with kid gloves, saying the party could become a “poor man’s version of Umno” that was incapable of defending its principles and bringing reform.
The political maverick also accused certain quarters in PKR of fearing to take action against Zulkifli as they felt the lawyer was popular among the Malays for his Islamic issues.
“Many feel that PKR is not serious in taking action. In fact, there those who predict it won’t take strict action within the time given,” Zaid wrote in a post headlined “Little Napoleon” in his weblog this morning.
PKR’s political bureau yesterday slapped a gag order against Zulkifli who went against the party line to lodge a police report against Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad over the “Allah” issue.
PKR de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had said the bureau had also referred Zulkifli to a disciplinary panel for further action within 30 days.
It is understood that the political bureau meeting was fiery with many asking for action against the former Anwar lawyer who has crossed the party line a few times since being elected in Election 2008.
But a few felt action against the former PAS member would jeopardise the party’s standing among the majority Malay Muslim electorate.
Analysts said the episode exposes the soft underbelly of Anwar’s party — the desire to portray itself as multiracial but living with the constant fear of losing its pull with the Malay voters.
Zaid lamented that Zulkifli has ignored the gag order and has continued to insult the pact’s stand in rival Umno-controlled media.
“It’s strange that Zulkifli Noordin is an ‘untouchable’ in the party; one wonders why there is something special here.
“That is why he can criticise anyone as a ‘Little Napoleon’ or those who are powerless, people like me ,” he added.
The former Umno minister said the episode has convinced him that PKR cannot defend core principles in its struggles.
“Only the easy and expedient. PKR today is not that different from Umno, only its mold or just ‘a poor man’s version of’ Umno,” Zaid wrote.
Saying it was clear that Zulkifli’s action was to destroy the party from within, Zaid noted those who fear taking action against Zulkifli felt they risked alienating his supporters.
“But Zulkifli Noordin is not a warrior of Islam, not a Malay warrior. His attitude, action and words are the same as Umno champions,” he said, adding the politician had clearly made statements that are against decisions of the party and Pakatan Rakyat.
“He has given the impression to the people that PKR and Pakatan Rakyat have betrayed the Muslims and Malay Rulers for allegedly allowing those of other faiths to insult Islam especially in the “Allah” issue.
“For me, if we are not confident of our stand in the ‘Allah’ issue and other issues brought by Zulkifli Noordin, then just follow Umno and Zulkifli Noordin. But if we are confident and we hold to principles in the Federal Constitution, and the religious scholars, we must persist with our stand.
“Until when do we want to play politics in two worlds, sticking to one principle there and switching to another here,” he wrote.
Zaid noted there are party colleagues who will now ask him to be patient and follow the legal steps for action to be taken against the recalcitrant Zulkifli.
“I agree. That’s why we should suspend Zulkifli Noordin until the investigations are completed because his offence is clear and continues for those who can and want to see,” he added.
Zaid said PKR must be fair to Zulkifli but also equally fair to the thousands of members who need to be protected when defending party and Pakatan Rakyat principles
“In saying all this, I might be sacked by PKR because I don’t have invincibility like some PKR leaders. But I am used to being sacked and I will continue to voice political struggles that are principled and healthy for the good of PKR and Pakatan,” said Zaid, who had joined PKR after being sacked by Umno in late 2008.
“We are incapable of being a party to bring reforms to national politics and administration if we can’t settle the Zulkifli Noordin issue in the appropriate way,” he added.
Zaid concluded by saying PKR ally PAS has shown its principles and courage for taking action against Selangor PAS commissioner Datuk Dr Hasan Ali, “but PKR is afraid of the Kulim Bandar Baharu MP”.
Little Napoleons — Zaid Ibrahim
JAN 27 — Parti Keadilan Rakyat hari ini membuat keputusan merujuk kes Zulkifli Nordin kepada Jawatankuasa Disiplin parti untuk menyiasat serta membuat keputusan terhadap beliau dalam masa 30 hari.
Parti juga mengeluarkan “gag order” atau larangan supaya beliau tidak lagi mengeluarkan kenyataan yang boleh memudaratkan parti serta merosakkan perpaduan Pakatan Rakyat.
Hebat bunyi keputusan PKR. Nak ikut “due process “atau proses keadilan dalam undang undang. Sebenarnya ramai orang merasakan PKR tidak serius untok mengambil tindakan.
Malah ada yang mengagak tidak akan ada satu keputusan yang tegas akan diambil dalam tempoh tersebut. Sementara itu Zulkifli Nordin setiap minit akan terus menghina pendirian Pakatan dalam TV UMNO dan surat khabar UMNO dan tidak akan peduli arahan parti, sama seperti yang telah dia lakukan pada masa-masa yang lepas.
Hairan juga keadaan ini, seolah-olah Zulkifli Nordin adalah seorang manusia yang tidak boleh disentuh oleh parti; entah mengapa ada keistimewaan itu.
Sebab itulah Zulkifli menggelar sesiapa saja yang mengkritiknya sebagai “Firaun Kecil” atau “Little Napoleon”, iaitu merujuk kepada pegawai parti yang tidak ada taring; maksudnya orang seperti saya.
Selepas hari ini, saya yakin PKR tidak mampu mempertahankan sesuatu prinsip utama dalam perjuangan nya.
Hanya yang mudah dan expedient. PKR hari ini tak jauh bezanya dengan UMNO; cuma ia hanya seperti acuan atau “a poor man’s version of” UMNO.
Ada pihak amat takut untuk mengambil tindakan terhadap Zulkifli Nordin, walaupun jelas tindakannya yang mahu menghancurkan parti dari dalam, kerana bimbang dengan persepsi bahawa orang Melayu dan Islam sayang kapada Zulkifli Nordin.
Dia konon nya popular dengan “isu Islam nya”. Tapi Zulkifli Nordin bukan wira Islam. Bukan wira Melayu.
Sikap, perbuatan dan kata-katanya sama dengan jaguh-jaguh UMNO. Lagi pula Zulkifli Nordin terang-terang membuat kenyataan yang bertentangan dengan keputusan parti dan Pakatan Rakyat.
Apa yang dilakukannya hanyalah memberi gambaran kepada umum bahawa PKR dan Pakatan Rakyat telah mengkhianati umat Islam dan Raja Melayu kerana kononnya sanggup membiarkan orang agama lain menghina Islam, terutamanya dalam isu penggunaan perkataan Allah.
Bagi saya, kalau kita tidak yakin dengan pendirian kita dalam soal penggunaan perkataaan Allah ini, dan isu lain yang dibawa olih Zulkifli Nordin ikut saja UMNO dan Zulkifli Nordin.
Tapi kalau kita yakin, kalau kita berpegang kapada prinsip dalam Perlembaggaan Persekutuan , dan pendapat alim ulamak maka kita mesti teruskan dengan pendirian kita. Sampai bila kita mahu berpolitik dua alam; di sana kita berpegang kepada satu prinsip, di sini kita bertukar kepada prinsip lain pula.
Mungkin ada rakan-rakan yang akan berkata tindakan akan diambil selepas siasatan jawatankuasa parti, dan minta saya bersabar. Ikut lunas undang undang.
Saya memang setuju, sebab itu kita sepatutnya gantung Zulkifli Nordin sementara siasatan selesai. Kerana kesalahan nya jelas dan berterusan bagi mereka yang dapat dan mahu melihat. Kita perlu berlaku adil kapada dia , tetapi kita juga perlu berlaku adil kapada ratusan ribu ahli parti yang mengharapkan pembelaan dalam mempertahankan prinsip perjuangan parti dan Pakatan Rakyat.
Dalam memperkatakan semua ini saya mungkin dipecat olih parti Keadilan kerana saya tidak ada kekebalan saperti sasetengah pemimpin PKR. Tapi saya biasa kena pecat dan saya akan terus menyuarakan perjuangasn politik yang sihat dan bermaruah untok kebaikan PKR dan Pakatan.
Kita tidak mampu menjadi parti yang akan membawa perubahan kapada politik dan pentadbiran Negara kalau Zulkifli Nordin pun kita tidak bolih selesai dengan cara yang sepatutnya.
Nampaknya PAS lebih berprinsip dan berani kerana sanggup mengambil tindakan kapada ketua negeri Selangor nya Dr Hassan Ali, tetapi PKR takut kapada ahli Parlimen Kulim Bandar Baru. — myzaidibrahim.wordpress.com
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Friday, January 22, 2010
Iban, Kadazan, Bidayuh, Kayan, Kenyah are all stupid idiots! They continue to become the "fixed deposit" of UMNO Najis bastards!
The Iban, Bidayuh, Kadazan, Kayan, Kenyah....and many Sarawakian and Sabahan are such idiots and remain to be so for many years! They are already far behind the Malays in West Malaysia but their stupidity and igorance make them think otherwise! Thay remain to be loyal to the UMNO bastards agent in Sarawak, namely PBB, SUPP, SPDP, PRS......although this greedy agents bastards took their land and sell it to the UMNO bastards.
I doubt thare will be any change in the coming election in Sarawak or Sabah because it is well known that you can buy a stuid Iban or Kadazan vote with just a packet of Maggi mee! They are just uneducated and "bodoh" as seen by a West Malaysian!
Luckily....we are not in this land of stupid hornbils!
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
The Truth, the Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth! Herald in Malaysia
1. The Herald has been around for more than 15 years.
2. The Herald was first published in English only.
3. By the late 1990s, there already was a Bahasa Malaysia edition, which occasionally contained the term “Allah”.
4. Upon request, and to meet growing demand, Tamil and Chinese editions were added simply to allow Catholics who were more familiar with those two languages to have their community news and spiritual guidance explained for their better understanding. These editions covered a few pages respectively.
5. Likewise, the thousands of East Malaysian students in government universities in Peninsula Malaysia, who are active in the Catholic Students Society in their respective universities, had requested to have pages added in Bahasa Malaysia (BM).
6. These East Malaysians students over the past 15 years were naturally those who were educated completely under the Bahasa Malaysia medium and with little exposure to English (for the majority of them).
7. In addition to the students, thousands of East Malaysians have been flocking to the Klang Valley for better prospects and simply to “cari makan”, just like other Malaysians from all over the peninsula. Again, the majority would be BM-educated and more comfortable worshiping in Bahasa Malaysia than in English.
8. Like for the Tamil and Chinese editions, the East Malaysians naturally wanted the Bahasa Malaysia edition to be about their own community news, besides some local and global Catholic church news translated from English to Bahasa Malaysia.
9. Bahasa Malaysia was, after all, their common denominator, i.e. the national language, propagated by the government themselves over all other languages since the late 1970s (hmmm . . . I wonder who was the education minister who started it all).
10. The East Malaysians themselves wrote the original content and translated some of the English pages in The Herald to Bahasa Malaysia. One can easily surmise this from the writers’ by-lines as well as from the “Letters to the Editor” in the Bahasa Malaysia edition since its beginnings, around 12 years ago.
11. If these East Malaysians used “Allah” in their praise and worship all their lives — as did their parents, grandparents and the generations before them — it would only be natural that they would write their articles and reflections, as well as do translations, using the only word they know for the “Lord our God”, the God of Abraham and Moses. The one Almighty God.
12. The word “Allah” was never and will never be used to refer to Jesus in any Bahasa Malaysia translation. That is one blatant piece of misinformation that so many peninsula Malaysian Muslims have been wrongly led to believe.
13. When former Home Minister Datuk Syed Hamid Albar imposed a blanket ban on the use of the word “Allah” in The Herald, as well as on imported Christian Bibles and other literature in both print and multimedia formats from Indonesia, the church appealed.
14. After appeals and all other avenues failed, the Catholic Church had no choice but to go to court because it is a basic deprivation of human rights in not allowing East Malaysian Christians the right to worship God in a manner they have used to worship Him all their lives and for generations past.
15. The Herald just wants the right for their Klang Valley-based East Malaysian readers to practise their faith, and share their community information, while learning about their own faith, in the only language they share, being as they are from various Bumiputera groups, and as how they have been practicing it all these years.
16. The Herald is only sold within church grounds, and has also complied with government requests to have “TERHAD (restricted)” and “FOR NON-MUSLIMS ONLY” on the cover, even if it was never to be sold or distributed outside church grounds in the first place.
17. The greatest lie being repeated over and over again, by ministers, morally-corrupt politicians, some Muslim scholars, some government-controlled media as well as misinformed members of the public is that the church started using the term “Allah” in The Herald since only a few years ago.
18. The other great lie is that the term is also intended for use in the English edition.
Read on:
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/opinion/k-anand/50053-a-letter-to-a-muslim-friend
2. The Herald was first published in English only.
3. By the late 1990s, there already was a Bahasa Malaysia edition, which occasionally contained the term “Allah”.
4. Upon request, and to meet growing demand, Tamil and Chinese editions were added simply to allow Catholics who were more familiar with those two languages to have their community news and spiritual guidance explained for their better understanding. These editions covered a few pages respectively.
5. Likewise, the thousands of East Malaysian students in government universities in Peninsula Malaysia, who are active in the Catholic Students Society in their respective universities, had requested to have pages added in Bahasa Malaysia (BM).
6. These East Malaysians students over the past 15 years were naturally those who were educated completely under the Bahasa Malaysia medium and with little exposure to English (for the majority of them).
7. In addition to the students, thousands of East Malaysians have been flocking to the Klang Valley for better prospects and simply to “cari makan”, just like other Malaysians from all over the peninsula. Again, the majority would be BM-educated and more comfortable worshiping in Bahasa Malaysia than in English.
8. Like for the Tamil and Chinese editions, the East Malaysians naturally wanted the Bahasa Malaysia edition to be about their own community news, besides some local and global Catholic church news translated from English to Bahasa Malaysia.
9. Bahasa Malaysia was, after all, their common denominator, i.e. the national language, propagated by the government themselves over all other languages since the late 1970s (hmmm . . . I wonder who was the education minister who started it all).
10. The East Malaysians themselves wrote the original content and translated some of the English pages in The Herald to Bahasa Malaysia. One can easily surmise this from the writers’ by-lines as well as from the “Letters to the Editor” in the Bahasa Malaysia edition since its beginnings, around 12 years ago.
11. If these East Malaysians used “Allah” in their praise and worship all their lives — as did their parents, grandparents and the generations before them — it would only be natural that they would write their articles and reflections, as well as do translations, using the only word they know for the “Lord our God”, the God of Abraham and Moses. The one Almighty God.
12. The word “Allah” was never and will never be used to refer to Jesus in any Bahasa Malaysia translation. That is one blatant piece of misinformation that so many peninsula Malaysian Muslims have been wrongly led to believe.
13. When former Home Minister Datuk Syed Hamid Albar imposed a blanket ban on the use of the word “Allah” in The Herald, as well as on imported Christian Bibles and other literature in both print and multimedia formats from Indonesia, the church appealed.
14. After appeals and all other avenues failed, the Catholic Church had no choice but to go to court because it is a basic deprivation of human rights in not allowing East Malaysian Christians the right to worship God in a manner they have used to worship Him all their lives and for generations past.
15. The Herald just wants the right for their Klang Valley-based East Malaysian readers to practise their faith, and share their community information, while learning about their own faith, in the only language they share, being as they are from various Bumiputera groups, and as how they have been practicing it all these years.
16. The Herald is only sold within church grounds, and has also complied with government requests to have “TERHAD (restricted)” and “FOR NON-MUSLIMS ONLY” on the cover, even if it was never to be sold or distributed outside church grounds in the first place.
17. The greatest lie being repeated over and over again, by ministers, morally-corrupt politicians, some Muslim scholars, some government-controlled media as well as misinformed members of the public is that the church started using the term “Allah” in The Herald since only a few years ago.
18. The other great lie is that the term is also intended for use in the English edition.
Read on:
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/opinion/k-anand/50053-a-letter-to-a-muslim-friend
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Malaysia will be the next Zimbabwe if there is no political reform in the country and continue bastardization by UMNO!
The seeds of the Zimbabwe tragedy were sown by the breakdown of the rule of law, the bastardization of the institutions of democracy to serve the ruling party, unchecked corruption by the elite and wanton plundering and wastage of national resources. The people were ruthlessly exploited by a ruling elite who had no intention of giving up power or their luxurious lifestyle.
Does this sound familiar in Malaysia? A country under bastadization of UMNO bastards.
Read this in http://hornbillunleashed.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/5338/#more-5338
Does this sound familiar in Malaysia? A country under bastadization of UMNO bastards.
Read this in http://hornbillunleashed.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/5338/#more-5338
Thursday, January 14, 2010
See this video on al-jazeera and see how this UMNO goon try to defend the act of violence by the muslim in Malaysia!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cV89G-wrgDQ&feature=player_embedded#
This video clearly show that the UMNO goon can hardly find a good reason for raising the allah issue and violence in Malaysia!
This video clearly show that the UMNO goon can hardly find a good reason for raising the allah issue and violence in Malaysia!
Najis aka Najib Tun Razak 1Malay...shit told Ibans dan Kadazan pilah! Bodoh punya budak!
Najis aka Shit, Najib Tun Razak told a group of UMNO bastards to tell the Iban and Kadazan Catholic to get lost if they do not like Malaysia and do not support the UMNO ruling of ban of Allah!Iban, Kenyah, Kayan, bidayuh, Kadazan.......time to kick the Ass of BN government! The stupid Mawan and Masing are too fat with corruption and no guts to say a thing.......so quiet!
These 2 UMNO bastards Muhyiddin and Khir Toyo now wanted to blame the Catholic church! They are the one incite the Malays to burn churches!
These two UMNO bastards act like the Taliban in Malaysia by wanting to cleanse the Malaysia of any Christian influence! They are the culprit behing the churches burning and now accused the churches being used by the opposition! They are like murderer accusing others are worth being killed because they are not supporting them!
Asshole Muhyddin and Khir Toyo!
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
UMNO bastards behave just like the Nazi to eliminate Christianity in Malaysia! 1st step stop you by using Allah!
Read below and you will understand what the UMNO bastards did and will continue doing is to rob from others to enriched thenselves! Today they can ban you from using Allah, tomorrow they can force you to bow to them wherever they are like the Japanese did in World War II and still legalised it!
These are the Nazi of Malaysia!
Hibiscus: Malay-speaking Christians address God as ‘Allah' as a mark of reverence, somewhat like how one would use ‘Papa' or ‘Mama' when one addresses one's parents. The first sentence of ‘Al-Kitab', the Indonesian Bible used by Malay-speaking Christians, is as follows: "Pada mulanya Allah menciptakan langit dan bumi." (‘In the beginning, Allah created the sky and the earth.')Is there anything so disagreeable in this sentence?
How would you feel if your neighbour suddenly tells you not to call your father ‘Papa' or your mother ‘Mama' because he is using the same words, the reason being that he might get confused as to who his parents are?Surely, he could not be confused if he knows who his parents are. Neither should he feel threatened that his parents might not recognise his voice.
Instead of forbidding Christians from using the term ‘Allah', Muslim teachers should exhort Muslims to pursue goodwill with other faiths, and explain that because Muslims and Christians revere God, both use term ‘Allah'.
These are the Nazi of Malaysia!
Hibiscus: Malay-speaking Christians address God as ‘Allah' as a mark of reverence, somewhat like how one would use ‘Papa' or ‘Mama' when one addresses one's parents. The first sentence of ‘Al-Kitab', the Indonesian Bible used by Malay-speaking Christians, is as follows: "Pada mulanya Allah menciptakan langit dan bumi." (‘In the beginning, Allah created the sky and the earth.')Is there anything so disagreeable in this sentence?
How would you feel if your neighbour suddenly tells you not to call your father ‘Papa' or your mother ‘Mama' because he is using the same words, the reason being that he might get confused as to who his parents are?Surely, he could not be confused if he knows who his parents are. Neither should he feel threatened that his parents might not recognise his voice.
Instead of forbidding Christians from using the term ‘Allah', Muslim teachers should exhort Muslims to pursue goodwill with other faiths, and explain that because Muslims and Christians revere God, both use term ‘Allah'.
Monday, January 11, 2010
Some stupid Malay think too much and thought that we like so much to call our god Allah! She must be joking! Frog who live under the coconut shell!
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/opinion/breaking-views/49192-allah-future-implications-of-the-high-court-decision--fatimah-zuhri
No wonder so many people had the wrong view about Islam. Thanks to these narrow minded Malays who will make Islam being labelled as intolerance, extremist, terrorist.......
No wonder so many people had the wrong view about Islam. Thanks to these narrow minded Malays who will make Islam being labelled as intolerance, extremist, terrorist.......
Sunday, January 10, 2010
This UMNO bastard Akhramsyah Muammar Ubaidah bin Sanusi ask Malays to burn all churches and not just Catholic because they don't support Islam!
This bastard called Akhramsyah Muammar Ubaidah bin Sanusi is from UMNO blogger and openly said in his blog to call upon muslim to act violent and throw bombs at all churches and not just Catholic because the other Christian is not supporting the Malays Muslim!
And Najis Tun Razak didn't even dare to touch him because he wanted popular support.....to be the UMNO head bastards!
Is he insane? Don't be cheated by his look...He may be the most dangerous muslim terrorist....His father is the previous UMNO bastard, Sanusi Junid the corrupted UIA ex-president! He dad is also a imigrant from the violent Acheh district in Indonesia! NO wonder he is such violent breed!
Read the article below:
UMNO 's mercenary Ahmad Johari vows to died to prevent allah used by others! Read this in BBC!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8447450.stm
See how fanatic the UMNO muslim in Malaysia.......
See how fanatic the UMNO muslim in Malaysia.......
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Utusan Malaysia the UMNO bastards newspaper try to create more tension in muslim in Malaysia! Try to divert blame to opposition!
If you understand Bahasa Malaysia, you can read this 2 articles to know how the UMNO bastards newpaperman try to propaganda the Allah issue and put the blame on opposition and glorify the act of burning churches in Malaysia!
This 2 article by the 2 UMNO bastards writer tells all.....
They will promote hatred and violence in Malaysia.
Malaysian should boycott Utusan Malaysia The UMNO bastards papers!
Muslim Consumer Association of Malaysia wanted to volunteer suicidal bombers for jihad?For the UMNO bastards!
Read http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/49064-ppim-offers-volunteers-to-secure-houses-of-worship
See how this UMNO bastards want their followers to incite racial tension! What in the hell did the Malay Consumer Association got to do to provide volunteers? They wanna provide suicidal bombers for the UMNO? Can't the police provide security in the country? Why we need consumer association to meddle in national security? Sure this is UMNO agenda!
The world would laugh at our useless police who only catch opposition party members but had no led or rather support muslim terorrist in Malaysia.
It is a known fact that the UMNO bastards are sponsoring indirectly the terrorist movement in Southern Philipine and Thailand and now these loose cannon are back in Malaysia. We are the top producer of terrorist in South East Asia! Nordin Mat Top!
See how this UMNO bastards want their followers to incite racial tension! What in the hell did the Malay Consumer Association got to do to provide volunteers? They wanna provide suicidal bombers for the UMNO? Can't the police provide security in the country? Why we need consumer association to meddle in national security? Sure this is UMNO agenda!
The world would laugh at our useless police who only catch opposition party members but had no led or rather support muslim terorrist in Malaysia.
It is a known fact that the UMNO bastards are sponsoring indirectly the terrorist movement in Southern Philipine and Thailand and now these loose cannon are back in Malaysia. We are the top producer of terrorist in South East Asia! Nordin Mat Top!
UMNO bastards sent police to protect the mosque and claims that others may attack them! UMNO bastards themselve may burn the mosques to incite fear!
New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/world/asia/09malaysia.html?ref=world
The UMNO bastards may wanna to create another religious riot by burning the mosques in Malaysia and put the blame on the Christian! That is why UMNO hooligan head Najis Tun Razak is asking police to patrol the mosque so that they can blamed the Christian is starting the fire later!
The UMNO bastards may wanna to create another religious riot by burning the mosques in Malaysia and put the blame on the Christian! That is why UMNO hooligan head Najis Tun Razak is asking police to patrol the mosque so that they can blamed the Christian is starting the fire later!
Friday, January 8, 2010
The same UMNO bastards who bring the cow head are the same who burned churches in Malaysia! Supported by Najis Tun Razak!
The same group of UMNO bastards and hooligan who caused the cow head issue may be the one who burns the Catholic churches as well.
I am sure the police and the Attorney General UMNO bastards would declared that there is no evidence who did it......
See the face of these UMNO bastards who wear 1 Malaysia cap....Shame and Shit on them.
See what the UMNO bastards will do to you if you are a Catholic in Malaysia! They will burn you and your churches!
The UMNO bastards led by Najis aka Najib Tun Razak and Kerismuddin aka Hishamuddin Tun Hussein Onn is asking the UMNO bastards to hold demonstrations and burning down the churches in Malaysia by fanning the Allah issues!
These UMNO bastards is trying to do what the barbaric muslim is doing in places like Somalia and Agfhanistan! Najis may even supply the C4 explosive that he used to blown up the Mongolian lady to these muslim terrorist group!
Let us all condemn them and vote them out!
UMNO bastards are responsible for the burning of churches in Malaysia by inciting muslim to go riots! Vote them out!
By Asrul Hadi Abdullah Sani
KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 8 — Datuk Zaid Ibrahim today condemned Umno and urged the government to take full responsibility for the church attacks.
“It has to take full responsibility for the worsening of relations between people of different faiths in this country in its handling of the use of the word Allah.
"The irresponsible conduct of fanning the emotions by Umno leaders has brought about this dangerous situation. What we see today confirms that this country is being governed not by engagement consultation, sophistication or persuasion but by brute and mob force,” he said in a press statement.
Early this morning, a Protestant church was torched while homemade explosives were thrown at a Catholic church next to the Assunta Hospital.
“The Umno-led government has the penchant to use force or flexing of authority in dealing with delicate issues. Take the case of the ban imposed on the Herald. They could easily have engaged in consultation with the church in Sabah and Sarawak. They should try to understand why the need to use the word Allah without any preconceived notions or prejudice. After all, they have been using the word Allah for many years before BN government acted to ban the Herald.
"They could easily have also engaged in discussions with the various Muslim groups about their legitimate concerns on whether the church are surreptitiously converting Muslims and explore ways to address these concerns in spirit of dialogue and peaceful deliberations,” he said.
He explained that there are already laws against converting Muslims but Umno instead chose to politicise the sensitive issue.
“There is already a law against converting Muslims anyway. They could have done a lot more. But because of their lack of maturity and sophistication banning is the obvious choice.
“They want instant popularity so fanning the emotions of Muslims becomes legitimate... and when the court ruled otherwise they then fan the Muslims to oppose the ruling. The people of this country will not escape the scourge of Umno-led rule until they decide once and for all to dislodge this government in the next available opportunity.”
PAS has also reminded and warned its members not to engage in any demonstrations organised in the Kampung Baru Mosque, Shah Alam Mosque and the National Mosque after Friday prayers.
The protest is being orchestrated by several Muslim NGOs in retaliation against the High Court's ruling on Dec 31 allowing the Catholic Church to use the word "Allah" in its weekly publication the Herald.
PAS vice-president Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man had said that the demonstration on the use of the word “Allah” is Umno’s position and not the party’s.
"We call on all members of PAS in order not to be dragged in the same demonstration sponsored by Umno," he told party’s newspaper.
PAS backs the use of the word Allah by Catholics because it is consistent with the federal Constitution and Islamic principles.
Tuan Ibrahim instead asked the members to join the protest against the Egyptian government's unjust action that prevents entry of the Viva Palestina convoy to Gaza from the country.
The demonstration organised by PAS Youth and other NGOs are expected to protest in front of the Egyptian Embassy after Friday prayers.
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has also defended his government’s decision to allow angry Muslim groups to hold a nationwide protest against the “Allah” ruling, saying they have every right to do so. He is promoting racial and religious terrorism!
However, Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan yesterday warned that action will taken against groups planning to stage protest rallies against the use of the word “Allah”.
KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 8 — Datuk Zaid Ibrahim today condemned Umno and urged the government to take full responsibility for the church attacks.
“It has to take full responsibility for the worsening of relations between people of different faiths in this country in its handling of the use of the word Allah.
"The irresponsible conduct of fanning the emotions by Umno leaders has brought about this dangerous situation. What we see today confirms that this country is being governed not by engagement consultation, sophistication or persuasion but by brute and mob force,” he said in a press statement.
Early this morning, a Protestant church was torched while homemade explosives were thrown at a Catholic church next to the Assunta Hospital.
“The Umno-led government has the penchant to use force or flexing of authority in dealing with delicate issues. Take the case of the ban imposed on the Herald. They could easily have engaged in consultation with the church in Sabah and Sarawak. They should try to understand why the need to use the word Allah without any preconceived notions or prejudice. After all, they have been using the word Allah for many years before BN government acted to ban the Herald.
"They could easily have also engaged in discussions with the various Muslim groups about their legitimate concerns on whether the church are surreptitiously converting Muslims and explore ways to address these concerns in spirit of dialogue and peaceful deliberations,” he said.
He explained that there are already laws against converting Muslims but Umno instead chose to politicise the sensitive issue.
“There is already a law against converting Muslims anyway. They could have done a lot more. But because of their lack of maturity and sophistication banning is the obvious choice.
“They want instant popularity so fanning the emotions of Muslims becomes legitimate... and when the court ruled otherwise they then fan the Muslims to oppose the ruling. The people of this country will not escape the scourge of Umno-led rule until they decide once and for all to dislodge this government in the next available opportunity.”
PAS has also reminded and warned its members not to engage in any demonstrations organised in the Kampung Baru Mosque, Shah Alam Mosque and the National Mosque after Friday prayers.
The protest is being orchestrated by several Muslim NGOs in retaliation against the High Court's ruling on Dec 31 allowing the Catholic Church to use the word "Allah" in its weekly publication the Herald.
PAS vice-president Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man had said that the demonstration on the use of the word “Allah” is Umno’s position and not the party’s.
"We call on all members of PAS in order not to be dragged in the same demonstration sponsored by Umno," he told party’s newspaper.
PAS backs the use of the word Allah by Catholics because it is consistent with the federal Constitution and Islamic principles.
Tuan Ibrahim instead asked the members to join the protest against the Egyptian government's unjust action that prevents entry of the Viva Palestina convoy to Gaza from the country.
The demonstration organised by PAS Youth and other NGOs are expected to protest in front of the Egyptian Embassy after Friday prayers.
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has also defended his government’s decision to allow angry Muslim groups to hold a nationwide protest against the “Allah” ruling, saying they have every right to do so. He is promoting racial and religious terrorism!
However, Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan yesterday warned that action will taken against groups planning to stage protest rallies against the use of the word “Allah”.
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Gani Patail the chief UMNO Dog in Law and the bastards in Malaysia!
This man will be forever cursed by all Malaysian as the Chief Dog of Law for the UMNO bastards in Malaysia for all the role he played in various cases in Malaysia with UMNO bastard interest!!
Gani Patail the shit who licked Najis ass!
Monday, January 4, 2010
Beza Antara Merebut Nama Allah Dan Mempertahankan Akidah. (Between using the name Allah and being a true muslim)
If you are a Malaysian whether a muslim or non muslim, you can read this article and understand how shallow is the brain of the UMNO bastards!
http://drmaza.com/home/?p=566#more-566
Even a muslim intellectual know that the UMNO is just trying to stirring up political issue!
http://drmaza.com/home/?p=566#more-566
Even a muslim intellectual know that the UMNO is just trying to stirring up political issue!
The confused UMNO do not know who is Allah! They only know to support Palestine and terrorist!
Confident people do not get confused — Marina Mahathir
JAN 4 — I found by chance this article the other day: “Prophet Muhammad’s Promise to Christians”.
The document is not a modern human rights treaty but even though it was penned in 628 AD it clearly protects the right to property, freedom of religion, freedom of work, and security of the person, says Muqtedar Khan.
Muslims and Christians together constitute over 50 per cent of the world and if they lived in peace, we will be half way to world peace. One small step that we can take towards fostering Muslim-Christian harmony is to tell and retell positive stories and abstain from mutual demonisation.
In this article I propose to remind both Muslims and Christians about a promise that Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) made to Christians. The knowledge of this promise can have enormous impact on Muslim conduct towards Christians. Muslims generally respect the precedent of their Prophet and try to practise it in their lives.
In 628 AD, a delegation from St Catherine’s Monastery came to Prophet Muhammed and requested his protection. He responded by granting them a charter of rights, which I reproduce below in its entirety. St Catherine’s Monastery is located at the foot of Mt Sinai and is the world’s oldest monastery. It possesses a huge collection of Christian manuscripts, second only to the Vatican, and is a world heritage site. It also boasts the oldest collection of Christian icons. It is a treasure house of Christian history that has remained safe for 1,400 years under Muslim protection.
The Promise to St Catherine:
“This is a message from Muhammad ibn Abdullah, as a covenant to those who adopt Christianity, near and far, we are with them.
“Verily I, the servants, the helpers, and my followers defend them, because Christians are my citizens; and by God! I hold out against anything that displeases them.
“No compulsion is to be on them. Neither are their judges to be removed from their jobs nor their monks from their monasteries. No one is to destroy a house of their religion, to damage it, or to carry anything from it to the Muslims' houses.
“Should anyone take any of these, he would spoil God's covenant and disobey His Prophet. Verily, they are my allies and have my secure charter against all that they hate.
“No one is to force them to travel or to oblige them to fight. The Muslims are to fight for them. If a female Christian is married to a Muslim, it is not to take place without her approval. She is not to be prevented from visiting her church to pray. Their churches are to be respected. They are neither to be prevented from repairing them nor the sacredness of their covenants.
“No one of the nation (Muslims) is to disobey the covenant till the Last Day (end of the world).”
The first and the final sentence of the charter are critical. They make the promise eternal and universal. Muhammed asserts that Muslims are with Christians near and far, straight away rejecting any future attempts to limit the promise to St Catherine alone. By ordering Muslims to obey it until the Day of Judgment the charter again undermines any future attempts to revoke the privileges. These rights are inalienable. Muhammed declared Christians, all of them, as his allies and he equated ill treatment of Christians with violating God’s covenant.
A remarkable aspect of the charter is that it imposes no conditions on Christians for enjoying its privileges. It is enough that they are Christians. They are not required to alter their beliefs, they do not have to make any payments and they do not have any obligations. This is a charter of rights without any duties!
The document is not a modern human rights treaty but even thought it was penned in 628 AD it clearly protects the right to property, freedom of religion, freedom of work, and security of the person.
I know most readers must be thinking so what? Well the answer is simple. Those who seek to foster discord among Muslims and Christians focus on issues that divide and emphasise areas of conflict. But when resources such as Muhammad’s promise to Christians are invoked and highlighted it builds bridges. It inspires Muslims to rise above communal intolerance and engenders goodwill in Christians who might be nursing fear of Islam or Muslims.
When I look at Islamic sources, I find in them unprecedented examples of religious tolerance and inclusiveness. They make me want to become a better person. I think the capacity to seek good and do good inheres in all of us. When we subdue this predisposition towards the good, we deny our fundamental humanity. In this holiday season, I hope all of us can find time to look for something positive and worthy of appreciation in the values, cultures and histories of other peoples.
Dr Muqtedar Khan is director of Islamic Studies at the University of Delaware and a fellow of the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding.
Now, when that delegation from St Catherine's monastery came to meet with Prophet Mohamad (pbuh), I suppose it's fair to assume that they spoke Arabic to one another. And when they were conversing, surely the word “God” must have come up. As in "May God Be With You" and such like. What word did the Prophet (pbuh) use for “God” I wonder? And what did the St Catherinians use in return? For monotheists like them, was there a “your God” and “my God” type of situation, or did they understand that they were both talking about the same One?
While some idiots are mourning over the “loss” of the word “Allah” and therefore basically telling the world that they are people easily confused by nomenclature, and others are predicting riots over what is basically a “copyright” issue, let me define what I think a confident Muslim should be:
1. A confident Muslim is unfazed by the issue of God's name. God speaks to all of humankind in the Quran and never said that only Muslims could call him by the name Allah.
2. A confident Muslim has 99 names to choose from to describe that One God. My favourites are Ar-Rahman (The All-Compassionate) and Ar-Rahim (The All-Merciful).
3. A confident Muslim never gets confused over which is his/her religion and which is other people's. For instance, a confident Muslim knows exactly what the first chapter of the Quran is. And it's not the Lord's Prayer.
4. A confident Muslim will not walk into a church, hear a liturgy in Malay or Arabic where they use the word “Allah” and then think that he or she is in a mosque. A confident Muslim knows the difference.
5. A confident Muslim is generous, inclusive and doesn't think that his or her brethren is made exclusive through the use of a single language. The confident Muslim is well aware that in the Middle East, all services of ANY religion are in Arabic because that's what they all speak.
6. A confident Muslim knows the basis of his/her faith are the five pillars of Islam and will not be shaken just because other people call God by the same name.
7. A Muslim believes in only One God. Therefore it makes sense that other people should call God by the same name because there is no other God.
ART THOU NOT aware that it is God whose limitless glory all [creatures] that are in the heavens and on earth extol, even the birds as they spread out their wings? Each [of them] knows indeed how to pray unto Him and to glorify Him; and God has full knowledge of all that they do: (Surah Nour, Verse 41) (Asad).
So I would ask those people demonstrating against the court decision, have you no pride? Are you saying you're easily confused?
And before anyone says I have no qualifications to say these things, read what Dr Asri Zainal Abidin (who does have qualifications no matter what JAIS says) has written about this very subject here.
And here's something interesting. In 2007, the Majlis Agama Negeri Perlis, which is a large majlis filled with people very learned in Islamic religious knowledge, discussed the question of the use of “Allah” by non-Muslims. Their unanimous decision? They issued a fatwa to say that there is absolutely nothing wrong with non-Muslims using the word at all. (This was told to me by Asri but I cannot find the fatwa anywhere online because all the religious departments' websites are so useless.)
Are we now going to excommunicate the whole of Perlis? — rantingsbymm.blogspot.com
JAN 4 — I found by chance this article the other day: “Prophet Muhammad’s Promise to Christians”.
The document is not a modern human rights treaty but even though it was penned in 628 AD it clearly protects the right to property, freedom of religion, freedom of work, and security of the person, says Muqtedar Khan.
Muslims and Christians together constitute over 50 per cent of the world and if they lived in peace, we will be half way to world peace. One small step that we can take towards fostering Muslim-Christian harmony is to tell and retell positive stories and abstain from mutual demonisation.
In this article I propose to remind both Muslims and Christians about a promise that Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) made to Christians. The knowledge of this promise can have enormous impact on Muslim conduct towards Christians. Muslims generally respect the precedent of their Prophet and try to practise it in their lives.
In 628 AD, a delegation from St Catherine’s Monastery came to Prophet Muhammed and requested his protection. He responded by granting them a charter of rights, which I reproduce below in its entirety. St Catherine’s Monastery is located at the foot of Mt Sinai and is the world’s oldest monastery. It possesses a huge collection of Christian manuscripts, second only to the Vatican, and is a world heritage site. It also boasts the oldest collection of Christian icons. It is a treasure house of Christian history that has remained safe for 1,400 years under Muslim protection.
The Promise to St Catherine:
“This is a message from Muhammad ibn Abdullah, as a covenant to those who adopt Christianity, near and far, we are with them.
“Verily I, the servants, the helpers, and my followers defend them, because Christians are my citizens; and by God! I hold out against anything that displeases them.
“No compulsion is to be on them. Neither are their judges to be removed from their jobs nor their monks from their monasteries. No one is to destroy a house of their religion, to damage it, or to carry anything from it to the Muslims' houses.
“Should anyone take any of these, he would spoil God's covenant and disobey His Prophet. Verily, they are my allies and have my secure charter against all that they hate.
“No one is to force them to travel or to oblige them to fight. The Muslims are to fight for them. If a female Christian is married to a Muslim, it is not to take place without her approval. She is not to be prevented from visiting her church to pray. Their churches are to be respected. They are neither to be prevented from repairing them nor the sacredness of their covenants.
“No one of the nation (Muslims) is to disobey the covenant till the Last Day (end of the world).”
The first and the final sentence of the charter are critical. They make the promise eternal and universal. Muhammed asserts that Muslims are with Christians near and far, straight away rejecting any future attempts to limit the promise to St Catherine alone. By ordering Muslims to obey it until the Day of Judgment the charter again undermines any future attempts to revoke the privileges. These rights are inalienable. Muhammed declared Christians, all of them, as his allies and he equated ill treatment of Christians with violating God’s covenant.
A remarkable aspect of the charter is that it imposes no conditions on Christians for enjoying its privileges. It is enough that they are Christians. They are not required to alter their beliefs, they do not have to make any payments and they do not have any obligations. This is a charter of rights without any duties!
The document is not a modern human rights treaty but even thought it was penned in 628 AD it clearly protects the right to property, freedom of religion, freedom of work, and security of the person.
I know most readers must be thinking so what? Well the answer is simple. Those who seek to foster discord among Muslims and Christians focus on issues that divide and emphasise areas of conflict. But when resources such as Muhammad’s promise to Christians are invoked and highlighted it builds bridges. It inspires Muslims to rise above communal intolerance and engenders goodwill in Christians who might be nursing fear of Islam or Muslims.
When I look at Islamic sources, I find in them unprecedented examples of religious tolerance and inclusiveness. They make me want to become a better person. I think the capacity to seek good and do good inheres in all of us. When we subdue this predisposition towards the good, we deny our fundamental humanity. In this holiday season, I hope all of us can find time to look for something positive and worthy of appreciation in the values, cultures and histories of other peoples.
Dr Muqtedar Khan is director of Islamic Studies at the University of Delaware and a fellow of the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding.
Now, when that delegation from St Catherine's monastery came to meet with Prophet Mohamad (pbuh), I suppose it's fair to assume that they spoke Arabic to one another. And when they were conversing, surely the word “God” must have come up. As in "May God Be With You" and such like. What word did the Prophet (pbuh) use for “God” I wonder? And what did the St Catherinians use in return? For monotheists like them, was there a “your God” and “my God” type of situation, or did they understand that they were both talking about the same One?
While some idiots are mourning over the “loss” of the word “Allah” and therefore basically telling the world that they are people easily confused by nomenclature, and others are predicting riots over what is basically a “copyright” issue, let me define what I think a confident Muslim should be:
1. A confident Muslim is unfazed by the issue of God's name. God speaks to all of humankind in the Quran and never said that only Muslims could call him by the name Allah.
2. A confident Muslim has 99 names to choose from to describe that One God. My favourites are Ar-Rahman (The All-Compassionate) and Ar-Rahim (The All-Merciful).
3. A confident Muslim never gets confused over which is his/her religion and which is other people's. For instance, a confident Muslim knows exactly what the first chapter of the Quran is. And it's not the Lord's Prayer.
4. A confident Muslim will not walk into a church, hear a liturgy in Malay or Arabic where they use the word “Allah” and then think that he or she is in a mosque. A confident Muslim knows the difference.
5. A confident Muslim is generous, inclusive and doesn't think that his or her brethren is made exclusive through the use of a single language. The confident Muslim is well aware that in the Middle East, all services of ANY religion are in Arabic because that's what they all speak.
6. A confident Muslim knows the basis of his/her faith are the five pillars of Islam and will not be shaken just because other people call God by the same name.
7. A Muslim believes in only One God. Therefore it makes sense that other people should call God by the same name because there is no other God.
ART THOU NOT aware that it is God whose limitless glory all [creatures] that are in the heavens and on earth extol, even the birds as they spread out their wings? Each [of them] knows indeed how to pray unto Him and to glorify Him; and God has full knowledge of all that they do: (Surah Nour, Verse 41) (Asad).
So I would ask those people demonstrating against the court decision, have you no pride? Are you saying you're easily confused?
And before anyone says I have no qualifications to say these things, read what Dr Asri Zainal Abidin (who does have qualifications no matter what JAIS says) has written about this very subject here.
And here's something interesting. In 2007, the Majlis Agama Negeri Perlis, which is a large majlis filled with people very learned in Islamic religious knowledge, discussed the question of the use of “Allah” by non-Muslims. Their unanimous decision? They issued a fatwa to say that there is absolutely nothing wrong with non-Muslims using the word at all. (This was told to me by Asri but I cannot find the fatwa anywhere online because all the religious departments' websites are so useless.)
Are we now going to excommunicate the whole of Perlis? — rantingsbymm.blogspot.com
Sunday, January 3, 2010
The crying Wee Ka Siong is indeed related politically and financially to Tiong King Sing! Share the same underwear too!
Read the link below and you will know.....
Saturday, January 2, 2010
UMNO is a barbaric muslim party! Even wanna to make sure no one speak Allah except the muslim! Wake up christian and catholic in Malaysia!
Wake up Christians and Catholics in Malaysia! The UMNO bastards are appealing against the high court ruling that Allah can be use for all in refering to god! I am sure they will elect another 3 muslim kangaroo federal judges to over rule the decision by the high court!
Catholic in the whole country especially in Sabah and Sarawak should vote the UMNO and BN out in next election!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
